 |
*
This article first
appeared in "Livebearers", journal of the
American Livebearers
Association.
In
2004 I received a bag of 6 young Xiphophorus mayae from another
hobbyist that I knew well. My interest in them developed
from having been told they were the
largest-bodied swordtail in the world, and that they had only
been recently identified.
I had been keeping another large swordtail, the
Xiphophorus montezumae, for a few years, and I wanted to
continue with trying
to raise the largest swordtails I could obtain.
Given a single species tank of at least 30
gallons with lots of live food, the mayae did very well. They
are a shy fish, often
preferring to stay hidden in the plants whenever
they feel threatened. I generally remove females when they
become gravid,
putting them into a 10 gallon tank with lots of
Java moss to raise up the young separately. They thrive on
frequent water changes
and some water movement, which I provide by using
simple box filters for filtration. I keep them in bare bottomed
tanks, with
floating plants (Java fern, java moss and
Bolbitis fern), or clay pots with plants potted in peat (Amazon
swords, Crypts etc).
Though I keep other swordtail species in my fishroom, I do not
have any developed high fin fish. On one occasion I had a high
fin male sent to me along with other fish, which
I then gave away to another hobbyist, but I have not kept a high
fin line in my
fishroom. These new mayae reached maturity and
were soon dropping fry. I have always had an interest in
spotting albino or
leucistic fry, so with new batches of young I
usually observe them fairly closely, and at some point- I truly
don’t remember the
exact date, at about a month old a fry was
spotted with an exaggerated dorsal fin. It appeared to be
undersized overall, so I
pulled what turned out to be a female and put her
in a breeder to make sure she ate well, and I could keep an eye
on her.
Having a fish appear that seemed to be “mixed’ is
a serious cause for concern. Who could have gotten in with the
mayae?
And not just been mixed in, but had been in the
tank long enough to mate with one of the females? And why had I
not seen it?
My fishroom is about 60 tanks, I have a number of
species, but there is nothing with a high fin. I went over
whether I had any
fancies that could be carrying the high fin
trait, but did not show it. Nothing came close. Because I wanted
to grow out these
mayae to their potential, I had kept them in a 50
gallon tank of their own, and they had never been moved. The
tank they
were in was high up on a stand without tanks next
to it, so other fish could not have jumped across- the reason I
keep all similar
species far apart from one another. I do keep a
large number of Xiphophorus alvarezi, a similar looking fish
when younger,
but they were not near the mayae tank, and
besides, they did not possess a high fin dorsal. It did not
appear that this fish could
have picked up the trait from any other fish in
my fishroom.
If the fish were a simple cross with a hifin X.
helleri, it would not be of interest, and its breeding program
would be dictated
by already well understood genetics. For it to
appear “spontaneously” within a species implies an entirely new
appearance of
a genetic trait that had not previously existed,
which then became of great interest. Is a double dose of the
gene lethal?
How does it affect other aspects of the fish’s
growth? Could this be an entirely new gene? The fish I obtain
are intended to be
bred and shared with other hobbyists- if this was
not a pure mayae I needed to know that. I could easily start a
contaminated
line in the hobby, which would continue to reveal
other non-mayae characteristics besides not being the fish I was
saying that
it was. Wanting to develop a high fin mayae from
having crossed it with an established X. helleri high fin line
is something I
did not have an interest in doing. If the
provenance could not be determined, the fish would have to be
destroyed to prevent
it from entering the hobby as a pure mayae.
So I needed to find out with some certainty
whether the line was pure when I received it. I called the
hobbyist I got them from,
aware that the panic I had just been through was
being passed on to him. He was positive that a cross could not
have happened
in his room, either, and he had only obtained
them about 6 months before he gave them to me, so he called who
he got them
from. We traced the line back 2 years, and were
ultimately convinced that an accidental cross could not have
occurred.
I spoke
with a number of people about this fish, and a group who felt
they would be the ones to know such things agreed to meet
me at the next ALA convention to take a look at
them. I brought a pair, and all agreed they didn’t look like
anything they’d seen-
certainly not an established helleri type high
fin dorsal. The following year I brought a pair and put them in
the show, and that
was the first time anyone had seen the fish.
I maintained my skepticism for a couple years,
primarily because it would simply have been too easy for a cross
to happen, but a
spontaneous appearance of a new gene could not be
considered lightly. Until it could be proven to me otherwise, I
felt that the
simplest solution continued to be the most
responsible explanation. However, as the trait revealed itself,
the proof I was hoping
for gradually presented itself.
When a single fish with a mutation appears, there
is a way to develop more fish with that mutation. I have the
minimal
knowledge of basic genetics most of us share,
having been familiar with the Punnet square diagram. When I see
a fish with
a mutation I wish to develop, I assume the trait
is recessive, in that I will not expect to see the trait
expressed by the young of
a breeding between that and a normal fish. Only
after I determine that a fish with a new mutation is healthy do
I attempt to
breed it, and occasionally a mutation may also be
sterile. This female looked good, and in fact became gravid,
producing 2 or 3
drops of young before she died. After being
crossed with a normal fish, the mating of the young from that
cross who carry the
trait, but do not show it, will produce young
displaying the new mutation 25% of the time. A mating of two of
those young that
show the mutation should then begin to produce
fish that are consistently showing the mutation. With swordtails
a generation
is generally considered to be 8 months, so the
appearance of a number of fish possessing the trait who are then
old enough to
breed will take approximately 16 months.
After the time it took to accomplish this, most
of the fry were not growing out as expected. I was hoping for
large Xiphophorus
mayae, just like their cousins across the room,
but now with high fin dorsals. What I was getting were often
little miniature fish.
They were quite cute actually, with all of the
color and much of the finnage, but they matured out early and
topped out at between
2 and 3 inches. It occurred primarily with males,
many of whom also possessed a long extended gonopodium, such
that they were
useless as breeders. I was getting concerned that
they would be the only high fin fish I’d have to work with, so
instead of culling
them, I put them in their own tank to see if they
would reproduce. I also knew that a new mutation may carry a
number of other
consequences, and that ultimately the line may
simply die out. These little fish didn’t reproduce, and instead
gradually died away
within just a couple months. But there did
continue to be occasional fish that grew out almost normally,
though still moderately
undersized when compared to the normal mayae. It
was within the finnage characteristics of these fish that I was
finally convinced
that the high fin occurrence was genuinely
spontaneous, and not the result of an accidental cross.
Both sexes carry the high dorsal fin, though it
can be dramatically different between individual fish, and the
basic female and male
structures differed- the females possessed
broader dorsals, often with the first 2 or 3 rays extended. The
male’s dorsal fins were
longer, thinner, almost banner-like, and
occasionally so long that they would extend out past the tail!
There was no consistency,
and there were still many normal finned fish
within each drop. My brief experience from working with fancies
was that if the high
fin had been the result of a cross with a well
established high fin line of X. helleri, the finnage should be
expected to show some
consistency. That was not the case with this
line. I was curious as to whether the normal finned fish within
each drop would then
be normal sized- I wanted to know if the high fin
trait was linked to their also being undersized. If there were
full sized normal
finned siblings, they could possibly be crossed
with better examples of the high fin fish to increase the
overall size of the line.
But though robust and healthy, only a few of the
normal finned fish in my cull tank have come close to reaching
full normal
mayae size.
I watch these fish fairly carefully, and rather than separating
them by sex as soon as possible, I have been allowing them
to grow up to sexual maturity together, first
removing any early maturing males, then all normal finned fish.
I try to move
them infrequently, and disturb them only when I
have to. When certain individuals draw my attention for their
overall size,
broadness and height of the dorsal fin, as well
as depth of color, I pull them to become breeders. I make sure
to remove
males I do not want as breeders before they
mature out enough to breed. Females I select for a combination
of overall
size and size of the dorsal fin.
With each subsequent generation, they are in
their 5th now, the number of high finned fish per brood seems to
be
increasing, though the percentage is better with
some females than others. I have a 50 gallon breeder tank with
about 15
fully adult fish, 4 females that are currently
regularly producing young. However, there are approximately 200
others in
various stages of growth. Because of the line’s
current inconsistency, I do not know how many will reach full
size until it
happens. I expect to see a higher percentage of
genuinely full sized fish with the current generation growing
out, though
I expect the next generation may still come from
about a half dozen pairs.
With each generation there has also been an
increase in the overall size of the fish. Fortunately, My
current breeders
have been fairly prolific, and do best when kept
in groups of their original drops. From this I have also seen
that the
percentage of high fins within each brood does
differ between females. I have also learned to be careful to
release future
breeders into the breeder tank only when large
enough to fend for themselves, I have still lost fish when
introduced at too
young of an age. All I can surmise is that the
longer finnage reduces mobility somewhat in their heavily
planted tank,
and when competing with larger fish, the smaller,
younger fish don’t fare as well.
I do feel that they are at least two generations
away from being somewhat consistent in their look and percentage
of
high fin young showing the trait. I was recently
approached concerning the potential for a “double dose” of the
high fin
trait possibly being lethal. All I can say is
that I have been breeding high fin to high fin to produce the
young I continue to
work with. However, I have had times where very
large females ultimately drop only 15 or 20 young- fish that of
that size
should be having broods 2 or 3 times that size.
This may imply lethality in utero, though I cannot say what this
means for
the hifin fry that survive.
I recently launched Select Aquatics (selectaquatics.com),
personally breeding and selling many of the specialty fish we
work with but often have difficulty finding, or
that we need to wait for the next ALA convention to obtain.
There are
now over 20 species, including some swordtails
and goodeids. These high Fin mayae will be offered again
shortly.
Greg Sage
Copyright Select aquatics 2011
selectaquatics@gmail.com
selectaquatics.com
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Back to Downloads Page
Home
Species for Sale
Fishkeeping Tips
Receiving and Shipping Fish
|
 |